sportnews full logo

Andoni Iraola's Frustrating Anfield Draw Against Nottingham Forest

Andoni Iraola left Anfield shaking his head – at his own team and at a piece of malfunctioning equipment that became an unlikely villain.

Liverpool’s new head coach saw his first home Premier League game end in a 2-2 draw with Nottingham Forest, a result that felt more like a warning sign than a platform. Forest led twice and were within touching distance of a third straight league win at Anfield before Víctor Muñoz crashed in an 82nd-minute equaliser to salvage a point.

The comeback masked nothing. Iraola knew exactly where the damage had been done.

A broken board and a broken rhythm

The flashpoint came with Forest’s second goal. Liverpool were preparing a triple substitution, trying to inject life and legs into a flat performance. Instead, chaos.

As Iraola attempted to send on his changes, Liam Delap took a quick throw-in. The fourth official, struggling with a faulty electronic board, could not display the numbers. Play continued. Seconds later, Forest had a penalty. Morgan Gibbs-White converted.

“I cannot explain because I don’t have an explanation,” Iraola said, clearly seething at the sequence that led to the spot-kick.

He insisted the changes should have happened minutes earlier.

“I wanted to make those substitutions about three minutes before. It was two, three, four times the ball had gone out. He [the fourth official] was having some problems with the board. The penalty wouldn’t have happened if I had made the subs.

“I had complained the previous time. The supporters were shouting and they were aware of the situation. I’ll leave you to decide whether it was a penalty or not.”

The technology failed. Liverpool paid. But Iraola refused to hide behind the malfunction.

Slow start, same story

For the second week running, Liverpool gave themselves a problem before they began to solve it. The first half, by their manager’s own admission, was nowhere near the standard required.

“The first half was poor, it was not good enough,” he said. “We haven’t controlled the game and after we improved a lot in the second half. We were much more intense, quicker on the ball and had more urgency, but it hasn’t been enough to win the game and we have to blame the first half.”

Forest capitalised on that passivity, twice edging in front and repeatedly unsettling a Liverpool side that never looked settled out of possession before the interval.

Iraola’s frustration came laced with a sense of opportunity missed.

“I am frustrated because we want to win, especially at home. It’s not a good result. We have come back from two results where we were losing and I like what we have done in the second half, but we haven’t been able to complete the comeback.”

Liverpool’s response after the break did at least offer a glimpse of what Iraola wants this team to be: aggressive, sharp, relentless. The intensity finally rose, duels were won, attacks flowed faster. Muñoz’s late strike felt like the natural product of that shift.

But it also came with a sting. Why did it take 45 minutes and a scare to reach that level?

Intensity issues and throw-in troubles

Iraola’s analysis was blunt. The problems were basic, and they were avoidable.

“In the first half we were too passive without the ball,” he said. “Afterwards we improved this and intensity gives you the chance to win duels and attack quicker and better. But in the first half there was a lack of intensity and we had issues with throw-ins today.”

Those “issues with throw-ins” cut deep, not only in the build-up to the penalty but across the contest. Forest exploited those moments, Liverpool hesitated, and a malfunctioning board only amplified a sense of disorganisation on the touchline.

The Anfield crowd roared them back into it, and Muñoz ensured Iraola’s home debut did not end in outright defeat. Yet the noise at full-time carried a different edge – not anger, but unease.

A late equaliser, a broken board, a broken rhythm. For Iraola, the question now is simple: how long can Liverpool keep living off second-half reactions in a league that rarely forgives slow starts?